calcnote ACI 318-19
Feedback Try it yourself →

Sample result

bf = 24, tf = 8, bw = 12, hw = 16 in (T-shaped) 10-#8 f′c 4,000 psi fy 60 ksi About X Full inputs

Checked about X: depth = 24 in

This is a live sample output for a tied column, bf = 24, tf = 8, bw = 12, hw = 16 in (T-shaped), with 10-#8 longitudinal bars (f′c = 4,000 psi, Grade 60), checked per ACI 318-19 under Pu = 300 kip and M2 = 150 kip-ft. The section is evaluated with the general polygon strain-compatibility model; unlike the rectangular and circular samples it is not checked against a published reference. For background, see the verification pages, the full report (PDF) and the methodology. Run your own column to get an editable .docx calc-note.

PASS

Both axial and moment D/C ratios ≤ 1.00.

P-M interaction diagram

P-M interaction diagram showing demand point against the φ-reduced capacity envelope

Demand (Pu, Mu) tested against the φ-reduced capacity envelope. Operating point (φPn, φMn) shown on the boundary. φ is computed per anchor from εt (§21.2.2); your operating point lies in the compression-controlled region; how the φ transition works.

Interaction Diagram Points (8 anchors, ACI 318-19 Table 22.4.2.1)
Anchor Description c (in) εt φ φPn (kip) φMn (kip-ft)
1 Pure compression cap N/A N/A 0.65 911.42 0.00
2 Cap intersection 21.37 0.00002 0.65 911.48 237.25
3 Compression-controlled limit (εt = εty) 12.72 0.00207 0.65 616.32 365.61
4 Transition lower (εt = εty + 0.0015) 9.82 0.00357 0.78 612.77 427.86
5 Tension-controlled limit (εt = εty + 0.003) 7.99 0.00507 0.90 558.86 469.25
6 Tension-controlled deep (εt = εty + 0.008) 4.94 0.01007 0.90 236.11 339.18
7 Pure bending 3.52 0.01530 0.90 0.00 227.20
8 pure_tension N/A N/A 0.90 -426.60 0.00
Strength-reduced interaction curve ACI 318-19 §22.4.2 · §21.2.2
Quantity Value
Pu (factored axial demand, kip) 300.00
φPn (axial capacity at operating point, kip) 689.44
Mu (= M2, design moment, kip-ft) 150.00

No transverse load between supports. Cm from end-moment ratio per ACI 318-19 §6.6.4.5.3(a).

φMn (moment capacity, kip-ft) 344.72
c (neutral axis depth, in) 14.48
εt (extreme tension strain) 0.00145
φ (strength reduction factor) 0.65
φ regime (§21.2.2) Compression-controlled φ = 0.65 throughout (εt ≤ εty = 0.00207)
D/C axial 0.43
D/C moment 0.43
kl/r about X 17.08

Nonsway frames only (ACI 318-19 §6.6.4.3).

kl/r limit 34.00
Tie spacing limit (§25.7.2.1) 16.00 in (governed by 16·d_bar)
Bar clear spacing (§25.2.3) 2.00 in ≥ 1.50 in
Input summary (values as entered)
Section geometry
Section bf = 24, tf = 8, bw = 12, hw = 16 in (T-shaped)
Results assume compression at the marked face of the section drawing; reversed loading may govern and is not checked.
Ag (gross area) * 384.0 in²
Ast (total steel area) * 7.90 in²
ρ (reinforcement ratio) * 0.0206 (2.06%)
Materials
f′c 4,000 psi
fy (longitudinal) 60 ksi (Grade 60)
Concrete Normal weight
Reinforcement
Longitudinal bars 10-#8
Bar distribution 10 bars around the perimeter (one at each corner, the rest spaced along the edges)
Clear cover 1.5 in
Transverse #4 ties @ 12 in
Loads
Pu 300 kip
M2 (larger end moment) 150 kip-ft
M1 (smaller end moment) 0 kip-ft
Curvature Single
Bending axis X
Transverse load between supports No
Slenderness parameters
Lu (unsupported length) 120 in (10.00 ft)
k (effective length factor) 1
* Derived from entered dimensions and reinforcement; not directly entered.

Section diagram

(bending about X)
X Y 24.0 in 24.0 in C
C marks the compression face (top face), X and Y are the centroidal axes, and the dots are the 10 longitudinal bars. The shaded band is the Whitney stress block, a = 12.31 in (β1c at the governing point).

Assumptions and limits

  • Tie arrangement and crossties (§25.7.2.3) are not checked.
  • Results assume compression at the marked face of the section drawing; reversed loading may govern and is not checked.

Pro tier · in development

More capabilities are on the way as calcnote grows. Pricing under discussion; help shape it.

Join waitlist →

Download

Same calc note in either format.

Tell us what worked (or didn't)

calcnote is in active development. What would make this output more useful for your work? What's missing? What looked wrong? Short or long, we read every reply.

Verdict method 9 · build 8c8c828 · generated 2026-10-28 01:53 UTC