calcnote ACI 318-19
Methodology Feedback Run a calc

Verification of calcnote's ACI 318-19 column engine

calcnote's interaction-diagram construction and operating-point capacity calculations are verified against three independent authorities. This page summarizes the results; the full verification report (PDF) carries the complete per-case derivations. The same reference cases run as regression tests on every code change, so these claims are re-checked continuously — last revalidated 2026-08-25.

Verdict

calcnote matches each published authority within the precision tolerance appropriate to that source:

Reference Comparison Agreement
StructurePoint published interaction-diagram example (ACI 318-19, spColumn v10.00-validated) 4 tabulated control points, canonical 16×16 / 8-#9 column ≤ 0.03%
Wight, Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics and Design, 7th ed., Example 11-4 Eccentricity at reference Pn, load cases 0.47–1.17%
Independent first-principles ACI 318-19 strain compatibility (re-implemented without calcnote source) All interaction-curve anchors ≤ 0.02%

The 14 test cases

Every case below is locked by regression tests that run on each code change. Deviation figures are the headline agreement in each reference's own comparison view — for chart-read Wight cases, eccentricity at the published capacity; for numerical references, the maximum across compared anchors. Documented design-choice divergences (the report's §5.1 polygon clamp at TC-1/TC-6) and the propagation of printed-chart reading error through steep curve regions are detailed line by line in the full report.

Case What it verifies Column Reference Max deviation
TC-1Interaction-diagram construction, 7 anchors16×16, 8-#9, Gr60, f′c 5 ksiWight Ex 11-1 + StructurePoint Table 1 + ACI baseline≤ 0.03 % (comparable anchors)
TC-2Design check, compression-controlled16×22, 8-#8, Gr60, f′c 5 ksiWight Ex 11-4 LC1≤ 1.2 % (chart precision)
TC-3Design check, φ-transition zone16×22, 8-#8 (same column)Wight Ex 11-4 LC3≤ 0.5 % (chart precision)
TC-4M2,min advisory + Grade 80 φ-formula14×14, 4-#9, Gr80, f′c 6 ksiFirst-principles baseline, 2-agent cross-validated≤ 0.006 %
TC-5ρ-minimum boundary, top-bar yield20×20, 8-#7, Gr60, f′c 4 ksiIndependent hand derivation, 2-agent cross-validated≤ 0.04 %
TC-6ρ-maximum boundary, 4-layer geometry16×16, 12-#11, Gr60, f′c 8 ksiIndependent hand derivation, 2-agent cross-validated≤ 0.07 %
TC-7Canonical small column, f′c 10 ksi12×12, 4-#11, Gr60, f′c 10 ksiIndependent hand derivation + golden regression suite±0.5 kip / ±2 kip·in tolerance
TC-8Medium multi-bar, rectangular section14×20, 8-#9, Gr60, f′c 5 ksiIndependent hand derivation + golden regression suite±0.5 kip / ±2 kip·in tolerance
TC-9Sub-M2,min regime, near-concentric16×16, 8-#9, Gr60, f′c 5 ksiIndependent hand derivation, 2-agent cross-validated≤ 0.02 %
TC-10Sub-M2,min regime, Gr80 3-layer24×12, 8-#8, Gr80, f′c 4 ksiIndependent hand derivation, 2-agent cross-validated≤ 0.035 %
TC-11Slender non-sway moment magnification (§6.6.4)14×14, 4-#7, Gr60, f′c 4 ksi, klu/r = 54Wight Ex 12-2 Col DE + first-principles baseline (both (EI)eff options)≤ 0.5 % vs printed chain (option (a) view; option-(b) delta disclosed)
TC-12Circular spiral column, interaction-diagram control points20 in D, 8-#10, Gr60, f′c 5 ksi, spiralStructurePoint circular spiral example (spColumn-validated)Printed-digit on 5 of 6 compared points; pure bending ≤ 0.008 % (stopping tolerance)
TC-13Circular tied column, control points (no published witness exists)18 in D, 8-#8, Gr60, f′c 4 ksi, tiedIndependent first-principles derivation, 2-agent cross-validated≤ 0.01 % (pure-bending bisection tolerance)
TC-14Rotated two-face column, bending about Y16×24, 8-#9, Gr60, f′c 5 ksi, about YIndependent first-principles derivation, 2-agent cross-validated≤ 0.01 % (pure-bending iteration tolerance)

Product scope

calcnote's scope is rectangular tied and circular (tied or spiral), uniaxially-loaded reinforced concrete columns per ACI 318-19 — short columns by direct analysis, slender non-sway columns by §6.6.4 moment magnification — within the input envelope below. The verification exercises 14 reference test cases inside this envelope (rectangular sections 12–24 in, circular 18–20 in D, f′c 4,000–10,000 psi, bars #7–#11) — the full report details each case.

Parameter Supported range
Sectionrectangular tied, 8–60 in each side; circular tied or spiral, D 10–60 in
Concrete strength f′c3,000–10,000 psi (normal-weight)
Steel gradeGrade 60, Grade 80
Longitudinal barsrect: 4–20 bars (multiples of 4), perimeter layouts; circ: 6–20 bars (even), equally spaced ring; #6–#11
Bendinguniaxial (about X or about Y)
Slendernessnon-sway: short columns + §6.6.4 moment magnification for slender (stops at δns > 1.4 and Pu ≥ 0.75·Pc)

Out of scope (not covered by this verification): biaxial bending, sway-frame magnification, non-circular unsymmetric sections, composite sections, torsion, and seismic special-frame detailing, among others. See the methodology for the full scope statement and design-choice rationale.

Test cases

Five cases have full browsable comparison pages (the complete set lives in the PDF report): Wight Example 11-1 — the canonical 16×16 / 8-#9 interaction diagram, cross-checked four ways · Wight Example 11-4 — operating-point checks at two load cases, boundary verdict flip explained · Wight Example 12-2 — the §6.6.4 slender-column magnification chain · Circular spiral column — StructurePoint's 20 in spColumn-validated example, three-way comparison · Bending about Y — 16×24 two-face column rotated to the weak axis, two independent derivations.

Continuous revalidation

The reference cases above are encoded as automated regression tests that run against the engine on every code change. A drift beyond the stated tolerances fails the build before it can deploy — the numbers on this page cannot silently rot as the engine evolves.