calcnote ACI 318-19
Methodology Feedback Run a calc

TC-14: a 16×24 column bending about Y

TC-14 is the first verification case that bends about the Y axis. The other thirteen cases all bend about X (the default), so they exercise depth = h. About Y swaps the bending plane: depth = b, width = h. The bars stay on their physical faces, but each bar's depth from the compression face is recalculated in the rotated frame. This page cross-checks calcnote's rotated engine output against two independent first-principles ACI 318-19 strain-compatibility derivations that were produced without access to the engine code.

Case definition

Section16 × 24 in (Ag = 384 in²), about Y (depth = b = 16 in, width = h = 24 in)
Reinforcement8-#9 perimeter two-face (Ast = 8.00 in², ρ = 2.08%)
Materialsf′c = 5,000 psi, Grade 60
Cover to bar centroid (δ)2.439 in (1.5 in clear + #3 tie + half a #9 bar)
LoadingPu = 300 kip, M2 = 150 kip-ft → e = 6.0 in (e/b = 0.375)
Slendernesskl/r = 25.0 < 34.0 (short column, no magnification)

What rotation changes

In a two-face layout the bars sit on the top and bottom faces (physically along h). About X, those faces are the compression and tension faces, so d ranges from δ to h − δ. About Y, the compression face rotates 90° to the b-face. Each bar's depth becomes d = b/2 − x, where x is the bar's horizontal coordinate. The eight bars resolve to four distinct depths:

Layer d (in) As (in²) Position
12.4392.0Near compression face (corners)
26.1462.0Interior (two-face spacing)
39.8542.0Interior (symmetric)
413.5612.0Near tension face (corners)

P-M anchor comparison

Seven-anchor φ-reduced interaction diagram, compared across two independent derivations (Agent A and Agent B, each working from ACI 318-19 strain compatibility without access to the engine code) and the calcnote engine:

Anchor εt target Derivation φPn (kip) calcnote φPn (kip) Derivation φMn (kip-ft) calcnote φMn (kip-ft)
1Cap (0.80Po) 1,080.56 1,080.56 0.00 0.00
2Cap intersection 1,080.56 1,080.55 127.37 127.37
3εt = εty 415.37 415.37 246.86 246.86
4εt = εty + 0.0015 295.13 295.13 270.65 270.65
5εt = εty + 0.003 193.18 193.17 279.98 279.97
6εt = εty + 0.008 Pn < 0 (below pure bending); diagram clips at Anchor 7
7Pure bending 0.00 0.00 220.23 220.20

Anchors 1 through 5 match to four or more significant figures. At Anchor 6, the continuous curve crosses Pn = 0 before reaching εt = εty + 0.008; the diagram terminates at the pure bending point (Anchor 7). The 0.01% Anchor 7 difference (220.23 vs 220.20 kip-ft) is iteration tolerance on the Pn = 0 root.

Operating-point comparison

At Pu = 300 kip, M2 = 150 kip-ft (eccentricity e = 6.0 in), the demand ray crosses the φ-reduced polygon between Anchors 2 and 3:

Quantity Derivation calcnote
φPn,op (kip) 473.01 473.01
φMn,op (kip-ft) 236.51 236.51
D/C 0.634 0.634
Verdict PASS PASS

Verification method

No published textbook or vendor example uses this exact section with bending about Y. The derivation was produced by two independent agents (A and B), each working from ACI 318-19 strain-compatibility principles without access to the engine source code. Both agents agree on all anchor values and on the operating-point D/C.

What TC-14 proves

Sources